|
|
|
Unsatisfiability
|
26 April 2002 at 13:10
[link]
|
I went to dinner the other day with some friends. One of the
people who came brought her boyfriend, a person I had never
met before. Now, he seemed nice enough, though I didn't have
all that much to say to him.
When the waitress came, he asked whether it would be possible
to get separate checks. She said that no, it wasn't, and went
away to get drinks or something. While she was gone, he started
complaining that it was unforgivable that they wouldn't allow
separate checks, and that he wouldn't order anything and wouldn't
go to that restaurant ever again. I figured this would just be
idle grumbling, but he repeated these comments
to the waitress when she returned. She stated that it was simply
the restaurant's policy not to allow separate checks. He
continued to complain. Finally, she offered to break her own
employer's policy, and pulled a second check from her book to
take his order. Nope, this wasn't good enough any more -- she
had failed him, and it was too late. He refused to order any
food. Miffed, the waitress took the rest of our orders and left.
Between then and the arrival of our food, our hero decided that
nothing about the restaurant could satisfy him, and he left,
his girlfriend following.
I find it hard to understand the mentality of a person who refuses
to be satisfied. Maybe it's the Canadian in me, willing to accept
a certain amount of inconvenience with equanimity. I mean, he
might have had perfectly legitimate reasons for wanting separate
checks, and he was entitled to make the request. But in my mind,
if it's the restaurant's policy not to honour that request, then
he must respect that policy as a part of his dining experience.
Looked at another way, if you don't like the way we do things here,
then you're welcome to eat somewhere else; you won't be missed.
Even worse, however, was his refusal to order when she bent over
backwards to please the customer. It takes a special kind of
hardheadedness to forgo victory in order to inflict further
punishment. He was truly leaving the waitress with no opportunities
to make him happy. Really, what could she have done at that point?
The scary thing is, I think that I used to get into a similar mood
from time to time. This was mostly when I was a teenager, so maybe
it was a hormone thing (yeah, that's it, a hormone thing). I
would spend an afternoon in a mood where nothing anyone did or
said was good enough for me. Eventually I would snap out of it
and realize I was being a jerk. In the long run, I guess I grew
out of those moods, or trained myself out of them. And perhaps
that's why I'm so bothered by the behaviour I witnessed the other
day -- I have a sore spot for behaviour in others that I've managed
to exorcize from my own personality.
|
|
| |
|
Even jogging could be fun
|
19 April 2002 at 18:23
[link]
|
I've always talked about how much I'd like to have "seven-league boots",
devices that would attach to my feet and somehow greatly increase
my stride and jumping ability. Something like a pogo stick attached
to each leg. I'd just love to stroll to school
with five-foot-long legs, at the pace of an inline skater or runner.
Alas, I've never seen such devices for sale anywhere, and I've had
to content myself with flying dreams.
Following a long chain of links, today I discovered
Powerskip.
They attach to your lower legs, and augment your Achilles'
heels with enormous springs. They allow you to stand tall,
run fast, and jump high.
Unfortunately, I'm not going to go out and pick up a pair
tomorrow. They're manufactured in Germany, and hard to get
in North America. Besides, they're quite expensive. Some
other time, perhaps. Alternatively, you're welcome to send
me a pair.
|
|
| |
|
Conquering the ravages of time
|
19 April 2002 at 15:11
[link]
|
When I was in Montreal in February, my mom bought me a lovely
Levi's watch. For a long time, I had been wearing wristwatches
not on my wrist, but tied around a belt loop. This new watch
was obviously the right one for me: instead of a band, it had
a metal clip designed specifically to attach to a belt loop.
True, it had a design flaw: the watch face hung right-side-up,
the wrong orientation if one's goal is to read the time by
looking down at the watch. But overall I was pleased with the
gift.
The watch stopped working about two weeks ago. Kaput. And
it broke just as I was on my way to a conference where I was
giving a talk. I was to be stranded without a timepiece when
I most needed to stay organized. Well, I made it through the
conference, and when I got home I had the battery replaced,
thinking that was the problem. It wasn't. I let the jeweller
hang on to the watch, in case the problem was easily remedied.
The next day, the jeweller told me that there was a mechanical
problem, and he could fix the watch for thirty dollars. That's
significantly more than the watch cost. I thanked him and
took the watch back. I should point out that by the end of
the week, this jewelry store had posted banners that it was
going out of business. Coincidence? Yes.
A couple of days later, I called Levi's in the US. I was very
impressed -- they immediately offered to replace the broken watch.
The nice lady took my address and told me she'd send me a mailing
label that I could use to send in the watch.
She called the next day and told me that because I had bought
the watch in Canada, I had to contact Levi's there to get the
replacement. I called them. They took my information and
told me that because another company manufactures the watch
under contract to Levi's, that company would contact me.
Two days later, an email came (addressed to "Mr. Caktlan", the
worst misspelling of my name I've ever seen). The email was from
someone at "Midore Inc." (never heard of them), telling me that
I had to contact "Genender Inc.", as they are the licensed
distributors. I left a message there last night.
Genender called this morning. I could send them my watch and
they would fix or replace it. Sure, the free mailing label
originally offered to me got lost in the chain of referrals, but
there's still a chance that I'll end up with a working watch for
a minimal cost (one long-distance phone call and some postage).
The upshot is that I now have a concrete address to send the
watch to. Is this the final chapter? Or will I receive a postcard
from Lesotho saying that they had received my watch and were forwarding
it to their repair centre in Iceland? You watch the time, and
I'll time the watch.
* * *
In other time news, I finally decided today that I was fed up
with the time on my home Linux box being consistently off by
half an hour. In about a half hour, I found a HOWTO about getting
one's Linux machine to keep accurate time, re-enabled ntpd (a
program that automatically sets your computer's clock by querying
an authoritative computer on the internet),
located a freely-accessible ntp server, introduced
myself to it, and poof! Time that's always correct. But I see
from my computer's now-correct time that it's 12:08PM. Ah, time
flies. And so must I.
[update: 21 May at 11:30]: Yesterday, I left a message with Genender asking them what was
up. This morning, they called back to tell me that the watch
was currently in their QA department, where it was being run for
48 hours to verify that it was working. Then it would be sent
back to me. A mood of cautious optimism reigns here at Thingo
central.
|
|
| |
|
Thingo scientists discover strange new form of matter
|
14 April 2002 at 19:47
[link]
|
Nath made a pie today. Now, this event in and of itself
has great local significance, because the pie is bound to
be delicious. Of course, most of you will not experience
the deliciousness, and must instead be contented with this
only tangentially related visual mystery.
The recipe for the pie crust called for a small amount of
very cold water. To obtain such water, Nath filled a small
bowl and put it in the freezer. She pulled the bowl out
a little while later, and discovered to her surprise a
small "stalagmite" sticking out from the surface of the freezing
water at a bizarre angle. Observe:
These photos aren't doctored in any way (except for some cropping).
Now I ask you: how could such a rod of ice form in the freezer?
It can't be the stalagmite brother of a stalactite hanging inside
the freezer (think about why that can't be). I would say that you
should check back here soon to learn the shocking answer, but really
you shouldn't expect anything of the kind. I have no idea how this
shape can arise. If you have a plausible theory, please
share it with me.
[update: 15 April at 08:49]: The pie was good. Mmmmmmm.
[update: 19 April at 11:38]: Independent researchers have attempted to validate the
remarkable findings at Thingo labs. Chris suggested
that a stalagmite was formed, and once frozen, its weight
caused it to tilt into the orientation shown. Jason
posited that the water contracted as it froze, forcing a
spur of ice out as the outer surface had to fit into a
smaller area. But Eric, ever the scientist, wins with a
theory that even has an official name: Giant's Causeway.
He says that ice expands when it freezes (I believe
that in fact, H2O occupies a maximal volume at
4 degrees celsius and begins contracting below that, but the
principle is the same). Eric says: "as the ice freezes part
of it forms a nice hexagonal crystal embedded in still-liquid
water. If the rest of the water forms less-organized crystals
then as it expands it will tend to force the existing column out."
For his diligent pursuit of the truth, Eric will receive
a quarter cup of water, with which he can attempt to duplicate
the experiment.
[update: 22 April at 11:41]: Dawn reports that the experiment has been successfully duplicated,
or at least observed in the wild a second time. She saw the
phenomenon twice in a friend's ice cube tray. Dawn suggests
it's aliens. I see no reason why Freezer Gnomes have to be from
another planet.
|
|
| |
|
Introducing... Zebula
|
12 April 2002 at 00:02
[link]
|
Last week, Nath and I went for our first ultrasound. I've never
watched an ultrasound before, and it's totally amazing. The technology
is so incredible, I almost believed that we were seeing something
we weren't meant to see so easily. On the other hand, it's nothing
like taking a photograph -- You get a sequence of 2D slices through
a 3D object, not a visualization of the outside surface of the
object you're looking at. So the able technician must reassemble
the slices into an object (in this case, a foetus) in their head
to make sense of what they're seeing. Plus, it's black and white
and pretty grainy. All these factors contribute to the uncertainty
of determining the sex of an unborn baby.
Despite all that uncertainty, the doctor was pretty confident in
her determination last week. She's fairly certain we're having a
girl. A girl!
Of course, this changes everything. Most importantly, Zebulon just
won't do anymore as a code name. I mean, Zebulon may be a perfectly
reasonable boy's name (well, it may be), but in continuing to
use it we risk confusing the poor girl. Fortunately, I had already
suggested the slightly modified "Zebula" in the case that we were
dealing with a girl. That'll have to be the code name from here on in.
Note: if you were planning to shower young Zebula with gifts, don't
feel that they now all have to be pink. Thank you. This message
brought to you by the gender stereotype marketing board.
|
|
| |
|
Totally tubular Thingo redesign
|
11 April 2002 at 23:44
[link]
|
Welcome to a brave new world of Thingo. As you can
no doubt tell, I've completely overhauled the look of
the site to bring it up to date and make it hip with
a younger demographic. It's certainly
marvy
groovy
cool
radical
hip
phat
hella good.
Okay, well actually all I did was replace the solid green
background with a subtle striped one. I've seen the stripes
a lot recently, particularly in the attractive new look
of Mac OS, and I decided I'd try them out for myself. Everything
else is exactly the same. But I thought I'd mention the
change both for its own sake and for the sake of breaking
ten days worth of silence.
|
|
| |
|
Inevitable cat pictures
|
01 April 2002 at 12:05
[link]
|
Obviously, ever since acquiring
a snazzy new digital camera, I'm obligated to put it through its
paces. At least, it's sort of fancy and I need to get familiar
with the various features and magic buttons.
Now when you live in a household that's full of cats, you know
you have an endless supply of willing subjects. Especially if
you're a cat
person, in which case every tiny pose or mannerism of your
cat is another opportunity for an endearing photo. Such is
definitely the case in this household, particularly
since my cats happen to be the cutest ones around.
And so, for no particularly good reason other than that the light
was rather nice yesterday, I present herewith a couple of portraits
of my pweshiss widdle kitties. Click on each one to see a larger
(slightly larger, not megapixelicious) version. Enjoy.
|
|
|